[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:46:18 +0100 |
How come that
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
says
"Any member of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as "you".
????
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, David Kastrup, 2010/02/07
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, RJack, 2010/02/07
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, David Kastrup, 2010/02/07
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/07
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, RJack, 2010/02/08
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/08
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, RJack, 2010/02/08
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/08
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, RJack, 2010/02/08
- Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/08