Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the
> > entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC
> > for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
> > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/dec/14/busybox-gpl-lawsuit/
> > in which (1) "the Software Freedom Conservancy" is utterly frivolous
> > 'plaintiff' because it doesn't own ANY busybox copyrights and (2) Erik
> > Andersen is also utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because he was NOT
> > joined by Bruce Perens and other contributors to the joint work known
> > as busybox at http://busybox.net/.
> 
> Under your legal theories, Apple could not sue for violation of MacOSX
> licenses unless Berkeley university joins their lawsuit.

A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see 17
USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and only
Apple, silly. 

Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership is
about

"New and revised computer source code" and NOT A COMPILATION WORK you
stupid dak.

http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=2&ti=1,2&Search%5FArg=busybox&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=C56aDfGGYoWR1oMK5BIoLaV4QdHU7&SEQ=20100210103005&SID=1

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)