Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk

[Hyman Rosen]

On 2/10/2010 10:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership

<http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane>
    In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered
    copyright on the issues and the books.
    ... McFarlane’s registrations no more revealed an intent to claim
    copyright in Gaiman’s contributions, as distinct from McFarlane’s
    own contributions as compiler and illustrator, than the copyright
    notices did. The significance of registration is that it is a
    prerequisite to a suit to enforce a copyright.

GPL skeptics are so wrong, in so many ways.