Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation

[Alexander Terekhov]

Take your meds, Hyman.

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> Precisely. In order for a many-authored GPLed work to be a joint work,
> you would need to demonstrate that each author has so intended, and has
> intended to give all the co-authors equal rights to the work. 

Heck, are you seriously suggesting that the GPL doesn't intend to
"protect" user's rights indended to be equal to the developers rights
and that co-author's developer rights under the GPL are not equal rights
to the other co-author(s), YOU MORON HYMAN? 

Please elaborate. TIA!!!

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)