Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/13/2010 7:11 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > A collective work can also be a joint work
> 
> It certainly can be, if all the authors of the collective
> work intend it to be so. That intent must be demonstrated.
> Since the BusyBox is licensed only under the GPL, its
> authors have indicated that it is not a joint work.

Take your meds Hyman. Since the GPL says nothing about going to the
toilet from time to time, the busybox authors are never pissing and
shitting, right Hyman?

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)