[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:29:05 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[magical source code]
> available at <http://opensource.actiontec.com/>, and
> offer physical copies for $10 as well.
Why don't you try it yourself (checking whether the offered source code
corresponds to the "complete corresponding source code" under the GNU
GPL), silly Hyman? Is it because you are insufficiently motivated to go
set up a GNU/Linux system so that you can do the builds, retard Hyman?
Why so?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
P.P.P.S. "We do not believe that the Copyright Act permits holders of
rights under copyrights to choose third parties to bring suits on their
behalf. While F.R. Civ. P. 17(a) ordinarily permits the real party in
interest to ratify a suit brought by another party, the Copyright Law is
quite specific in stating that only the "owner of an exclusive right
under a copyright" may bring suit."
Hyman's lovin'
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F3/402/881/510088/
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, (continued)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18