Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> Calling something intentionally different a corresponding source without
>> it being so in order to fulfill licensing conditions would be active
>> fraud, not just negligence.
>
> Uh silly dak. Breaching unenforceable contractual "licensing
> conditions" is "fraud" only in hilarious brain free zone known as the
> GNU Republic.

Your attention span zeroed out again.  We were not talking about
"breaching", we were talking about deliberately creating a misleading
impression of "not breaching".

> LMAO! Uh retard Hyman.

"Hyman?"  Your attention span really is at zero right now.  Have you
been drinking again?

-- 
David Kastrup