[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:22:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/22/2010 12:20 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman, why you're retardedly jumping to the conclusion bypassing the
analysis of condition v. covenant v. scope restriction conundrum?
There is no conundrum, just twisting and spinning by anti-GPL
cranks who want to convince people that violation of a license
does not constitute copyright infringement. The only person I
know of who was trying to fight that fight has just given up
and agreed to pay a $100,000 penalty for that point of view.
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22