Re: A simple question

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/21/2010 1:25 PM, RJack wrote:
> > How can someone infringe on another's copyrighted work without 
> > violating one the specific exclusive rights as described in 
> > sections 106 through 122 and section 106(A)? The answer to this 
> > question could resolve many disagreements among open source license
> >  debaters.
>
> Why do you believe that someone is claiming copyright infringement 
> outside of the enumerated rights of 17 USC 106? Even the FSF's wrong
>  opinion about dynamic linking rests on the incorrect belief that it
>  involves creating a derivative work, which is one of the enumerated
>  exclusive rights. The claims are about copying and distributing
> works without permission of their rights holders, just as in 17 USC
> 106.
>
> You seem very confused. Perhaps it is time for you to mention 
> preemption again?

I was addressing the Jacobsen decision  and "rights" of attribution. Me
thinks *you're* confused. Moron.

Sincerely,
RJack :)

"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.