Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/22/2010 5:06 PM, RJack wrote:
> > I've told you a hundred times that the Jacobsen appeals court panel
> >  violated CAFC rules.
>
> Court vs. crank. You can tell me a hundred times more, but nothing
> you tell me changes the fact that the so-called "valid" opinion is
> overturned.

1) The erroneous Jacobsen decision, having been voluntarily settled,
can't be overturned.

2) The erroneous Jacobsen decision can never be used as precedent in any
federal court of the United States.

3) I know you will deny these facts but then you feel free to deny any
fact and just make up your own. Solipsism is unfalsifiable and
unassailable through rational argument.


"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack :)