[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:29:13 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > http://www.boehmanwaltskanzlei.de/mehr-/vertragsrecht/details/lizenzvertragsrecht/355-der-lizenzvertrag.html
> >
> > "Allgemein versteht man unter Lizenz die Befugnis, das Immaterialgut
> > eines anderen zu benutzen. Als Immaterialgüter kommen insbesondere
> > Marken, Urheberrecht oder Patente Dritter in Betracht. Nachdem es nur
> > sehr wenige gesetzliche Regelungen gibt, werden Lizenzen üblicherweise
> > in individuellen Verträgen, den Lizenzverträgen, geregelt.
>
> "üblicherweise" means usually. The GPL is not "üblich", and is not
> handled in "individuellen Verträgen" but rather as a unilateral offer to
The GPL is an AGB ("standard" aka "boilerplate") form contract you
retard.
"Soweit Lizenzen (wie häufig) in Formularverträgen geregelt werden,
finden auch die Regelungen über die Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen der
§§ 305 ff BGB Anwendung."
Here's a judgment from a German court stating that obvious fact:
http://www.jbb.de/fileadmin/download/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
Uh crackpot dak.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_form_contract
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allgemeine_Gesch%C3%A4ftsbedingungen
Hth, silly.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23