Re: Settlements

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> told the judge that they had settled. If they had settled a
> little earlier, the plaintiffs would have just filed the
> settlement and that would be that.

When was the last time that plaintiffs in a GPL case filed a
(confidential) settlement to the court to be rolled into a court order,
retard Hyman?

> 
> > Yes in all previous cases SFLC delayed initial conference and motions.
> > But in the current case defendants seem to be willing to call the SFLC's
> > bluff in court.
> 
> It is not a bluff. It is a clear case of copyright infringement.

Take your meds Hyman. Take your meds.

"Defendants intend to show that the Plaintiff's have no damages, 
that the Defendants did nothing actionable under copyright law, 
that any alleged copying was not willful, that Plaintiffs are 
not the proper parties, that the copyright held by Mr. Andersen
is not applicable, and that, since being put on notice of the 
purported requirements of the general public license, Defendants 
have endeavored to come into compliance with what can only be 
described as a 'moving target'."

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)