[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlements
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Settlements |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:52:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/2/2010 8:35 AM, RJack wrote:
A U.S. appeals court can issue a ruling directly contradicting the U.S.
Supreme Court but it will only signify an appeals court in error
Until the Supreme Court itself says otherwise, the ruling of
the appeals court stands, regardless of how much you hate and
disagree with the decision. In the battle of crank vs. court,
court wins. Always.
- Re: Settlements, (continued)
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/03/01
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/03/01
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/03/01
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/03/01
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/03/01
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/03/02
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/03/02