Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

[Hyman Rosen]

On 3/10/2010 12:21 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-2.0.php
> doesn't even use the magic word "condition"!
>
> So much about CAFC's
>
> http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf
>
> "The Artistic License states on its face that the document creates
> conditions: "The intent of this document is to state the _conditions_
> under which a Package may be copied." (Emphasis added.)"

It still contains "provided that", which
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
    Under California contract law, "provided that"
    typically denotes a condition.