Re: GPL misappropriation

[Peter Köhlmann]

Hadron wrote:

> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/22/2010 3:41 PM, RJack wrote:
>>>> > That will never happen. Copyrights are exclusive rights and cannot
>>>> > be licensed by anyone except the *owner* of a copyright. Releasing
>>>> > BSD licensed code under the GPL is simply attempting to steal it.
>>>> 
>>>> BSD-licensed code gives others the right to create derivative
>>>> works without requiring that those derivative works be licensed
>>>> under the same terms.
>>>
>>> Meaning that material originally licensed under the BSDL must remain
>>> licensed under the BSDL (with just a few restrictions imposed on
>>> binary-only form) and not hijacked by the GPL retards, you moron
>>> Hyman.
>>
>> Seems like you don't understand the difference between copyleft and
>> weak permissive licenses.
>>
> 
> Wasn't it you who claimed all this was really easy to understand? And
> yet months later you're still here fighting bitterly ....

Fighting bitterly? Really?

Against the likes of Alexander there simply is no "fight"

Cretins like him would not understand something as simple as "1+1 = 2"

Do you actually claim that bullshitters like Alexander or "RJack" have 
anything of value to add?
Do you actually claim that those cretins are not oxygen thieves?
-- 
Windows: Because everyone needs a good laugh!