Re: SFLC is SOL

[RJack]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote: [...]
> > to continue, and we indeed already have compliance from one of the 
> > defendants in the recent filings.
>
> Wow, you already have compliance one of the defendants? Sez who? 
> LMAO, silly Hyman!

The SFLC retreat into total defeat is easily verified on the PACER court
documents for SDNY. The plaintiffs can verify absolutely *nothing*
about their vacuous propaganda claims of "compliance". The plaintiffs
claimed infringement of:

"31. Mr. Andersen is, and at all relevant times has been, a copyright
owner under United States copyright law in the FOSS software program
known as BusyBox. See, e.g., “BusyBox, v.0.60.3.”, Copyright Reg. No.
TX0006869051 (10/2/2008)."

*******************************************************************
BusyBox, v.0.60.3.
Type of Work:   Computer File
Registration Number / Date:     TX0006869051 / 2008-10-02
Application Title:      BusyBox, v.0.60.3.
Title:  BusyBox, v.0.60.3.
Description:    Print material.
Copyright Claimant:     Erik Andersen, 1971- . Address: 352 North 525 East,
Springville, Utah, 84663
Date of Creation:       2002
Date of Publication:    2002-04-27
Authorship on Application:      Erik Andersen, 1971- ; Domicile: United
States; Citizenship: United States. Authorship: New and revised computer
source code by Erik Andersen.
Pre-existing Material:  Previous version of the program and computer
program code from other sources.
Basis of Claim:         New and revised computer source code by Erik Andersen.
Copyright Note:         C.O. correspondence.
********************************************************************    

The only link to the source code on the billion or so sites that Google
indexes is the BusyBox server. I am so thrilled that that the plaintiffs
are in compliance with their own demands concerning their program. Too
bad the defendants have told Erik Anderson to kiss their royal asses.

ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

Sincerely,
RJack :)