[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:08 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/16/2010 1:54 PM, RJack wrote:
There exist two mutually exclusive copyrights in a derivative work (17
USC ยง 103). Nothing but a claim of *contract* will legally secure the
two mutually exclusive permissions required to distribute a derivative
work "as a whole". (Assuming two authors).
The two permissions are secured, for GPL-covered works,
by both authors releasing their work under the GPL. No
contract is needed, the license is sufficient.
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, (continued)
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, chrisv, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Moshe, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04