Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Hyman Rosen]

On 4/7/2010 1:37 PM, RJack wrote:
> There is, of course, no link anywhere to BusyBox, v.0.60.3.
> for which the plaintiffs Complaint claims infringement.

Interesting that your "arguments" have devolved into outright
lying instead of merely being wrong. Pointless, too, since it
is so easy to refute them by reading the complaint
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.

The only mention of a particular version of BusyBox is
    31. Mr. Andersen is, and at all relevant times has been,
    a copyright owner under United States copyright law in the
    FOSS software program known as BusyBox. See, e.g., “BusyBox,
    v.0.60.3.”, Copyright Reg. No. TX0006869051 (10/2/2008).
    Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy is the corporate home
    for the BusyBox project and the designated copyright
    enforcement agent for Mr. Andersen with respect to BusyBox.

The complaint does not allege that the defendants are distributing
this particular version, and distributing any GPL-covered version
of BusyBox is copyright infringement unless the sources are properly
supplied as specified by the GPL. The defendants are required to
supply the sources for the version they distribute.