Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Alexander Terekhov]

amicus_curious wrote:
> 
> "Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
> news:E46vn.200849$Dv7.17644@newsfe17.iad...
> > On 4/7/2010 4:30 PM, RJack wrote:
> >> What appears to have happened is that the SFLC filed a mindless
> >> copyright infringement claim concerning “BusyBox, v.0.60.3.” that
> >> they can't possibly win so they are attempting to cut their losses as
> >> quickly as possible. Further prosecution of the suit would quickly run
> >> up substantial attorney fees assessed against the SFLC.
> >
> > But the SFLC has already won, since Comtrend is now in compliance
> > with the GPL. There are no losses to cut when you have not lost.
> 
> I was curious as to what was actually posted and I found, by following the
> link:
> 
> Not Found
> The requested document was not found on this server.

<MORON Hyman>

But the SFLC has already won, because it is the natural implication of
Comtrend being dropped from the suit.

</MORON Hyman>

regards,
alexander.
        
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)