[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:14:40 -0000 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 4/13/2010 9:20 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:15936
dtemeles@nvalaw.com is a real "attorney spending a great deal of time on
software related IP licensing and litigation matters".
http://nvalaw.com/
>
> I can quote meaningless random papers too!
> <http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf>
> But no matter how one construes the GPL, the requirement of
> consideration is not met. Though the licensors restrictions
> in rights might benefit the licensor, the GPL does not state
> whether those restrictions would translate into consideration
> and if consideration would benefit the licensor or a third
> party. The lack of a meeting of minds makes the GPL contract
> theory fly in the face of the UCC, state common law, and common
> sense. This leads us back to Moglens now plausible assertion
> that the GPL is not a contract.
http://www.sapnakumar.org/
sapnakumar.org is just yet another crazy academic akin to Moglen and
Lessig.
The stuff from crazy academics akin to Moglen and Lessig such as
sapnakumar.org is indeed mostly meaningless bullshit, I agree.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hadron, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, amicus_curious, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04