Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > [... Pee Jays therom ...]
> >
> > > a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to
> > > do
> > What part of YOU INDICATE ACCEPTANCE don't you understand retard
> > dak? ACCEPTANCE is a contract thing, idiot.


> Just because the GPL states something "indicates acceptance" does not
>  make it so since the recipient of software may choose not even to
> read the license.

The GPL license to many is like the written word of God. You should
accept it on faith alone.

You vile Heretic.

> Without an explicit signing, no contract is established. However, for
> the _sake_ of the redistributing party, acceptance is _assumed_,
> because otherwise we are talking not about a breach of conditions,
> but a criminal act:
Sincerely,
RJack :)