Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[David Kastrup]

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:

> On 4/13/2010 10:43 AM, RJack wrote:
>> Yes, this is true. The GPL clearly spells out illegal requirements
>> for permission to copy and distribute, and therefore there is
>> promissory estoppel available.
>
> The requirements of the GPL are perfectly legal and
> appropriate. Only an anti-GPL crank would believe that
> he could consider a straightforward license obligation
> to be illegal and therefore disregard it.

I don't think he believes the drivel he is spouting.  He just enjoys
annoying people, possibly by confusing others.

It does not seem like he has anything left to do for which people would
remember him favorably.

-- 
David Kastrup