Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[David Kastrup]

RJack <user@example.net> writes:

> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>> On 4/13/2010 7:34 AM, RJack wrote:
>>> So... I'll just ask the question once again. Where is the link to
>>> "BusyBox 0.60.3" which was registered and then claimed as the
>>> infringed work in the SFLC's Comtrend Corp. lawsuit?
>>
>> The SFLC lawsuit does not claim that BusyBox 0.60.3 is the infringed
>> work, as can easily be seen by reading the complaint,
>> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
>>
>>
>> The infringed work is "BusyBox".
>
> Yup. And because you say it is,

Because the complained says it is.

> black is white and up is down. (In the land of GNU)

It is not clear what kind of land you need in order to stop imagining
moving goal posts.

-- 
David Kastrup