|
| From: | John Hasler |
| Subject: | Re: Compliance detection tool |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:17:05 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
RJack wrote: > The erroneous non-precedential Jacobsen decision is strictly limited > to the one past defendant in a nation of 310 million people. So... > what's your point? While it is not a binding precedent it is still a precedent which can and will be cited. Non-binding precedents are routinely cited in US courts. It is not "erroneous" unless a higher court says so. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |