[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:47 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) |
RG <rNOSPAMon@flownet.com> writes:
> In article <ho7v0o$rfv$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@pas.espam.s.il.vous.plait.mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-03-21 22:14:30 -0400, Pascal J. Bourguignon said:
>>
>> > Sure.
>> >
>> > And the question remains why you should imposes your choices on me?
>>
>> Not only am I not imposing anything on you, I've already offered to pay
>> you for a commercial license. So you can have your cake (GPL licensing)
>> and eat it too (paid commercial licensing).
>>
>> My principal objection to the GPL is that its license requirements
>> regarding opening source code make it very unpopular with many
>> commercial developers, and therefore whenever possible, they choose
>> non-GPL alternatives.
>
> That's a much better way of putting it than your original formulation.
>
>> In short, I don't think GPL licensing gets you anything additional in
>> terms of getting code open sourced.
>
> ...
>
>> I think people should avoid GPL licensing their work as a pragmatic
>> means of ensuring maximal adoption.
>
> Here is where you are imposing your choices on others. Not everyone
> shares this quality metric of yours. Some people have goals other than
> insuring maximal adoption, like, oh, I don't know, making money for
> example. Such people might want to use the copyright laws not to force
> others to create open-source software but to create artificial scarcity
> in order to drive up prices. One can argue whether or not this strategy
> will be effective. One can argue (as Stallman does) that one ought not
> choose this quality metric for moral or political reasons. But neither
> the quality metric nor the strategy are unreasonable a priori.
Indeed these are the questions. I will have to think more about it, and
may be change the licence in the future (perhaps this year).
I also would like to contribute some of my code to some common library
and this would certainly require a change of license anyway.
But I need more time to think about it and work on it.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, (continued)
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Thomas A. Russ, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Nicolas Neuss, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Nicolas Neuss, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, RG, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Raffael Cavallaro, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Lieven Marchand, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Raffael Cavallaro, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Andrew Haley, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Raffael Cavallaro, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04