Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues

[RJack]

On 7/28/2010 8:41 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> SFLC gang 'won' $90,000 + attorneys fees and costs and expenses
> against LONG INSOLVENT AND ASSETS-DISSOLVED DEFENCELESS defendant on
> default.
>
> Congrats to Eben Moglen and his underlings.
>
> LOL.
>
> regards, alexander.
>
> -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive
> derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as
> GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU
> cannot.)


This judgment is not surprising. Judge Scheindlin is considered a
national expert on electronic discovery sanctions. She takes a very 
harsh view of parties who do not respond to discovery orders.
http://www.mttlr.org/voleleven/scheindlin.pdf

This is certainly a Pyrrhic default judgment for the SFLC. Since
Westinghouse no longer exists, the injunction is unenforceable against
Westinghouse. Getting a default judgment *granted* is one thing. Getting
a default judgment *enforced* is a whole 'nuther matter. The SFLC will
have to file in the California state court system to determine the true
successors in interest to Westinghouse in an attempt to collect the
fruits of their brilliant legal work.

Sincerely,
RJack :)