Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> NO, that's false. The GPL specifies different requirements for
> copies made for own use and for copies made for distribution.

Stop hallucinating Hyman.

Even if the GPL would really specify "different requirements" for copies
made for own use and for copies made for distribution, that would NOT
change the fact that failure to fulfil such requirements is a contract
breach and not a copyright infringement, because the GNUtian
requirements are nether conditions precedent to the license grant nor
limitations of the rights granted (license scope limitations).

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)