|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
| Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:34 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 8/5/2010 11:26 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Even if the GPL would really specify "different requirements" for copies made for own use and for copies made for distribution, that would NOT change the fact that failure to fulfil such requirements is a contract breach and not a copyright infringement, because the GNUtian requirements are nether conditions precedent to the license grant nor limitations of the rights granted (license scope limitations).
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
"Having determined that the terms of the Artistic License
are enforceable copyright conditions..."
In the battle of crank vs. court, crank loses. Always.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |