Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 8/5/2010 11:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise27.html
> > (VI.D.3. Section 117 Adaptations)
> 
> Yes. That's not a "fair use" permission as the OP claimed.

It has nothing to do with fair use, silly Hyman.

Not heeding your GNUtian "conditions" (illegal and hence void part of
contractually imposed obligations aside for a moment) is a contract
breach, not copyright infringement.

The copyright act has nothing to do with your idiotic "conditions".

The idea that the "copyleft hack" of copyright act is enforceable by 
the copyright act itself is utterly moronic.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)