[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:12 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
RJack <user@example.net> writes:
> On 8/19/2010 5:18 PM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>
>> The GPL is a copyright license, granting additional rights
>
> Are those additional rights that the GPL grants "In Personam" (contract
> rights) or "In Rem" (property rights)? I thought Article I, Section 8,
> Clause 8 of the United States Constitution gave Congress the power to
> grant new copyrights.
What use would a right be if you could not use it as leverage? You
can't do that if you have nothing to offer.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, (continued)
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08