Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[Alexander Terekhov]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> Ravicher's bombastic email when he was told about sanctions under rule
> 11:
> 
> http://www.terekhov.de/148-8.pdf

toddenny@gibsondunn.com,
pzimmerman@mosessinger.com,
andy@kaverlaw.com,
ekirsch@reedsmith.com,
odlanger@rkmc.com,
dleichtman@rkmc.com,
ejmcmahon@rkmc.com,
hiparness@rkmc.com,
seroberg-perez@rkmc.com,
jroth@schiffhardin.com,
ovshentov@jonesday.com,
schincisan@jonesday.com,
david.yohai@weil.com,
david.yolkut@weil.com,
syousuf@kanekessler.com

date Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:02 PM
subject SDNY Re: 1:09-cv-10155-SAS Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. v.
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al

Hi,

I've just read 148-8 exhibit on PACER (August 15 Email).

Please file a motion for sanctions against SFLC GNU legal beagles ASAP.

The charlatans at SFLC shall not be allowed to continue "litigating" in
the name of "public interest" for "the next couple of years".

It's time to stop the farce.

Thank you in advance.

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)