|
| From: | David Kastrup |
| Subject: | Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling) |
| Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:02:32 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > <chuckles> > > http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a792f4c2-2da4-4e7e-9e06-b1690d1bec2d > > "Recent decision reaffirms software license restrictions > > Sullivan & Worcester LLP Kimberly B. Herman, Michael A. Matzka and > Christopher T. Stevenson USA > > September 29 2010 I find it interesting that none of the commentaries you dig up is concerned about the small detail that the original versions of software were resold after being upgraded with a seriously discounted "upgrade versin" with specific licensing conditions pertaining to the original copy. Why is that? -- David Kastrup
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |