[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifi
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifictohis hardware? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:03:49 -0000 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2010 8:17 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hey Hyman how is the progress to get the source code for a refurbished
> > Insignia player you so badly needed some time ago, silly?
> >
> > <chuckles>
>
> Nothing yet. This is, of course, why the SFLC is still pressing
> its suit against Insignia.
LMAO!!!
The SFLC crooks are still *NOT* "pressing its suit against Insignia"
(that would be suing Best Buy
Stores, L.P. and BestBuy.Com, LLC) to begin with, stupid Hyman.
http://insigniaproducts.com/termsofuse.html
Best Buy Co., Inc. on the other hand is still pressing its suit against
moronic GNUtard plaintiffs:
"10. Owner and Operator of the Insignia Products Web site
10.1 Best Buy Stores, LP is the owner and operator of the Insignia
Products Web site."
"Best Buy Co., Inc. (Best Buy), erroneously sued in place of Best Buy
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Stores, L.P. and BestBuy.Com, LLC, answers Software Freedom Conservancy,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Inc. and Erik Andersens (Plaintiffs) Original Complaint (Complaint)
as follows:
[... snip answer ...]
COUNTERCLAIMS
Defendant/Counterclaimant Best Buy for its separate counterclaims
against Plaintiffs Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. and Erik Andersen
states and alleges as follows:
1. This is an action for declaratory judgment, together with such
further relief based thereon as may be necessary or proper, pursuant to
the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. There
is an actual controversy between Best Buy and Plaintiffs arising under
United States copyright laws, Title 17 of the United States Code.
2. The subject matter jurisdiction of this Court is founded upon Title
28, United States Code §§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201 and 2202.
3. Best Buy is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of
business at 7601 Penn Ave. South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423.
4. Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. alleges that it is a
not-for-profit New York corporation with its principal place of business
at 1995 Broadway, 17th Fl., New York, New York 10023.
5. Erik Andersen alleges that he has a residence in Springville, Utah.
6. Mr. Anderson alleges that he authored, developed and owns the
copyrights in a computer program called BusyBox.
7. Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. alleges that it is a copyright
enforcement agent for Mr. Andersen with respect to BusyBox.
8. Mr. Andersen and Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. (Plaintiffs)
allege that Best Buy has infringed Mr. Andersens alleged copyrights in
BusyBox.
FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
9. Best Buy restates and realleges each of the allegations set forth in
the Counterclaim paragraphs 1-8 above.
10. By filing the instant Complaint, Plaintiffs have purported to assert
a claim for copyright infringement by Best Buy of copyrights in BusyBox.
11. Best Buy has not infringed any copyrights in BusyBox.
12. Best Buy is entitled to judgment that it has not infringed any
copyrights in BusyBox.
JURY DEMAND
13. Best Buy requests a jury trial on all issues triable of right by a
jury.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Defendant/Counterclaimant Best Buy prays for judgment in its
favor against Plaintiffs/Counterclaimants as follows:
1. Dismissing Plaintiffs cause of action with prejudice and on the
merits;
2. Declaring that Best Buy has not infringed the alleged copyrights in
BusyBox;
3. Awarding Best Buy its costs, including reasonable attorneys fees,
incurred in connection with this matter; and
4. Awarding such other relief as this Court deems just and equitable.
Dated: New York, New York Respectfully submitted,
March 8, 2010
/s/ David Leichtman
David Leichtman (DL-7233) "
regards,
alexander.
"Plaintiff Erik Andersen is a work-from-home father who has gifted
to the world software underlying a significant body of consumer
electronics." ROFL
-- SFLC crooks Ravicher, Williamson, Spiegel
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, (continued)
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware?, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware?, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifictohis hardware?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifictohis hardware?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifictohis hardware?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- "lawfully made" 17 U.S.C. 109, Costco v. Omega, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specifictohis hardware?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?, RJack, 2010/12/08