On 8/5/2010 11:26 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Even if the GPL would really specify "different requirements" for
copies made for own use and for copies made for distribution, that
would NOT change the fact that failure to fulfil such requirements
is a contract breach and not a copyright infringement, because the
GNUtian requirements are nether conditions precedent to the
license grant nor limitations of the rights granted (license scope
limitations).
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf> "Having
determined that the terms of the Artistic License are enforceable
copyright conditions..."
In the battle of crank vs. court, crank loses. Always.