Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[RJack]

On 2/3/2011 10:54 AM, RJack wrote:
> On 2/2/2011 9:47 AM, RJack wrote:
>
> Uh... buh bye SFC and Erik Andersen:
>
> -------Filed 02/01/11------- ANSWER OF PHOEBE MICRO, INC.
>
> ... [snip]
>
> AFFIRMATIVE AND ADDITIONAL DEFENSES
>
> Phoebe Micro, as and for affirmative and additional defenses, alleges
> as follows:
>
> 1. The Complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be
> granted.
>
> 2. The GNU General Public License, Version 2, as alleged by
> Plaintiffs, is not enforceable.
>
> 3. On information and belief, Plaintiffs are not proper parties.
>
> 4. Plaintiffs are not entitled to assert a claim for statutory
> damages against Phoebe Micro under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c).


The attorney for PHOEBE MICRO is Andrew M. Kaver a single attorney firm.
http://www.kaverlaw.com/

It is glaringly obvious that Mr. Kaver has been in communication with
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP
http://www.rkmc.com/David-Leichtman.htm

The era of the GPL license and "Free as in Freedom" software" and its
attempted subversion of the principles of open source coding is about to
end.

Sincerely,
RJack :)