gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization


From: Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:16:23 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Alfred M. Szmidt, le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 15:33:51 -0400, a ecrit:
> >    > The GNU project is not a porject that is suitable for a bottom-up
> >    > organization -- its mission, and only mission, is to see that the GNU
> >    > system is and keeps being free software.  This has been explained
> >    > ample of times.
> > 
> >    I don't see how bottom-up cannot get this. How different is this from
> >    Debian in that regard for instance?
> > 
> > Debian renegaded on their goal of being a 100% free software system,
> > they now include non-free software.
> 
> What is called "Debian" does not include the non-free archive, that
> archive is not enabled by default, the user has to make an explicit
> action to enable it.
> 
> >  That is the danger, and it is very much real.
> 
> Agreed!
> 
> And that is where the social contract can help. While the Debian one
> does explicitly say that it wants to let Debian work also with non-free
> software, the GNU one can explicitly say that GNU contains only 100%
> purely free software, and does not even mention existence of non-free
> software (e.g. no firmware names in the Linux kernel).
> 
> >    > > How can we be sure and how can we support both those who do agree
> >    > > to uphold our values, by assigning roles and delegating
> >    > > responsibilities, and those who just want to contribute.
> >    > 
> >    > It has worked for 30 years,
> > 
> >    No, I have been hearing about issues for 8 years already, i.e. as much
> >    time as I have actually been involved in the GNU project.
> > 
> > And I've been involved for 30 years...
> 
> That's irrelevant.
> 
> You can't say that it has worked for 30 years, when I have seen issues
> for at least 8 years, which is already too long (and these issues may
> have crop up before I have been involved, I can't say, that's what I
> meant).
> 
> Samuel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
> gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

When you want to do something your way and RMS disagrees, that is not a
problem... at least for GNU.  Your disagreement and not getting what you
want is not a "problem", not for 8 years and not for 30 years..


-- 
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com 

DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive 
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com 

Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and extermination camps, 
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]