[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: List posting rules
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: List posting rules |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:35:47 +0100 |
Le samedi 2 novembre 2019, 20:01:24 CET Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
> I don't see why I should not be a moderator. Everyone has some kind of
> bias. Moderation is a difficult task.
To begin with, indeed everybody is to be biased, in the end… but what kind of
bias? Someone not having signed might as well be *anywhere* in the spectrum
between the Joint statement and RMS himself. Hence this is less evidently
biased, as anyone could be, in this —unfortunately heated— dispute be more
“neutral”, less extreme or “biased” as you.
> Brandon Invergo and Mike Gerwitz are also moderators, specifically to
> help avoid this kind of bias.
Afaik, this was a place of lax moderation, until then. *Adding* moderators is
likely to go in the (until then denounced) direction of growing censorship, a
direction that might be biased against one party or another. That could very
well go in censorship escalation into muting everybody. Or maybe they might
be less prone to censor?
Afaiu, adding moderator is likely to make an inclusive OR of decisions, that
is a sum of censorship. It would be reassuring to hear it’s going to be an
AND, so it’s a *product* of censorship (you would agree on moderation and only
censor those you both agree to put moderation on).
> > For example, given that the declared purpose of this is list is to talk
> > about governance, Sandra Loosemore's messages were in violation of the
>
> > following rule, and yet they were approved:
> The purpose of this list is spelled out in the list description.
> Sandra didn't post a discussion about governance, she didn't talk
> about restructuring the GNU Project. She spoke only about existing
> leadership.
On a governance thread. And even so, then we can freely attack people if
we’re not anymore talking about governance in the same mail (you should
release more mails then), and discuss about governance however we want if we
don’t talk about specific people, right?
- Re: List posting rules, (continued)
- Re: List posting rules, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Samuel Thibault, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03
- Re: “Restricting yourself to just one message a day to the list is not a bad thing” (was: List posting rules), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05
- Re: List posting rules,
Alexandre François Garreau <=
- Re: List posting rules, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Samuel Thibault, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/01
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else), Sandra Loosemore, 2019/11/01
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else), Dora Scilipoti, 2019/11/01
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else), Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/01