Re: puri.sm (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto)

[Dmitry Alexandrov]

Alexandre François Garreau <galex-713@galex-713.eu> wrote:
> Le lundi 4 novembre 2019, 14:51:08 CET Jean Louis a écrit :
>> * gameonlinux@redchan.it <gameonlinux@redchan.it> [2019-11-04 14:05]:
>> Look here how Purism, company behind the PureOS, one of the FSF endorsed 
>> fully free system distributions is disabling the Intel management engine:
>> 
>> https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3019569/purism-disables-intels-man 
>> agement-engine-on-linux-powered-laptops 
>> https://puri.sm/learn/avoiding-intel-amt/
>
> Purism do not respect users’ freedom: 
> https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported

I see the context of your letter and aware of certain deceptive marketing 
practices that had been used by puri.sm.  However, out of the context that 
claim looks glaringly unfair.

Iʼd like to remind, that puri.sm is the first company ever that designed a 
computer [0] with the requirements of ‘Respect your freedom’ certification in 
mind.

[0] https://shop.puri.sm/shop/librem-5/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature