[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: list moderation
From: |
DJ Delorie |
Subject: |
Re: list moderation |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:30:18 -0500 |
Alexandre François Garreau <galex-713@galex-713.eu> writes:
> Aren’t these two statements contradictory (as governance is made of by
> people,
> and currently a single one)? as it was stated before (for instance by Dora)
Consider the difference between "how does the consensus model compare to
the committee model?" and "I think John Doe should be on the committee."
Even at the RMS level, we can discuss "should RMS have more advisors?"
without specifically naming any.
- Re: list moderation, (continued)
- Re: list moderation, Marcel, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Andreas, 2019/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: list moderation, Samuel Thibault, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/05
- Filtering indirection [Was: Re: list moderation], Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- “Moderation” / “Censorship” / “Filtering” [Was: Re: list moderation], Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation,
DJ Delorie <=
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, DJ Delorie, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: list moderation, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2019/11/05
Re: list moderation, Andy Wingo, 2019/11/06
Re: list moderation, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/06
Re: list moderation, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/06