[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?)
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?) |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:25:19 -0500 |
indeed, this is the implied idea behind "collectively decide about the
organization of the project". The "social contract" is a first step in that
direction, to establish accountability towards a common goal that is clearly
formulated and communicated to the public. I think this also answers Alfred's
question about the goal of the text.
No, it doesn't. I asked a several questions, and they have gone
unanswered now multiple times. I get the feeling that you are more
interested in evading discusison, than fostering it -- I hope I'm
wrong.
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Concrete suggestions on how to make GNU more welcoming (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/07
- Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Jean Louis, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?),
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Do the proponents of GNU ‘Social contract’ value its paragraph about ‘harassment’ above the freedom-related ones? (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/07
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/05
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/05
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05