[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:20:05 -0500 |
> All in all, this should first be discussed with RMS before brought to
> public discourse.
It has been discussed with him and he has been told that these kind of
discussions and decisions need to be made in public.
I haven't seen you CC RMS, and infact -- it seems that you are trying
to evade any kind of input from him completely. If such decisions are
to be made in public, or not -- is his perogative. How the decision
making process of this project is to be done, handle, is for RMS to
decide. What do you find unclear about this?
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/13
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/13
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/14
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/14
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/15
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/14
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2019/11/15
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dora Scilipoti, 2019/11/16
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas, 2019/11/16
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dora Scilipoti, 2019/11/16
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09