[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Carlos O'Donell |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:21:21 -0500 |
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:44 PM Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:46:56PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Thanks, Andreas, for this new version! Some comments below.
>
> They are integrated into the attached new version. For good measure,
> I have capitalised "GNU System" as you did and thrown in a few italics
> as suggested.
This looks great! +1 from me.
I like that we have 4 straight forward items.
Cognitively I might like 5 items. Humans tend to like 3, 5, or 7 items.
You can count 5 on your hand.
Some cultures really like 5 item lists. Some cultures dislike the
number 4 and find it bad luck.
Cheers,
Carlos.
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Carlos O'Donell <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/12
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andy Wingo, 2019/12/12
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/17
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/23
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/27