[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A summary of some open discussions
From: |
Brandon Invergo |
Subject: |
Re: A summary of some open discussions |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:16:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 |
Mark Wielaard writes:
>> There is no such thing as a FSF steward, GNU maintainers are appointed
>> by RMS/GAC. The FSF has no say in the topic. You've keept
>> misrepresenting this over and over again.
>
> This is just a legal technicallity. The FSF has oversight
> responsibility over the GNU project. That means that the FSF needs to
> determine that GNU maintainers operate in a manner consistent with
> FSF's exempt purposes, have the needed expertise and that their
> activities can be monitored by the FSF board. So GNU Maintainers and
> Steering committees are technically appointed by the FSF (previously
> RMS when he was FSF president and board member) as stewards of GNU
> packages. Basically GNU maintainers serve at the pleasure of the FSF.
This is absolutely false.
As a member of the package evaluation team and as an Assistant
GNUissance (maintainers@gnu.org), I have personally been involved in
many appointments of new maintainers at every step of the process, from
first contact with GNU through to post-appointment bureaucracy and
occasional check-ins. I also have the authority to appoint new
maintainers of existing packages myself (only Richard can appoint
maintainers of new packages). In fact, I personally appointed some new
co-maintainers of Guix back in September, two weeks *after* Richard
resigned as president of the FSF, which Ludovic can confirm.
I can categorically say that the FSF is not involved whatsoever in the
appointment of new maintainers.
Please do not spread misinformation about the GNU project.
--
-brandon
ps - To correct Alfred: the GAC is also not involved in the appointment
of maintainers (unless Richard were to ask them for advice in specific
cases).
- Re: A summary of some open discussions,
Brandon Invergo <=
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/06
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Brandon Invergo, 2020/01/06
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Brandon Invergo, 2020/01/06
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Andy Wingo, 2020/01/06
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Andreas Enge, 2020/01/06
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, nylxs, 2020/01/08
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Andreas Enge, 2020/01/08
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Jean Louis, 2020/01/08
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, nylxs, 2020/01/08
- Re: A summary of some open discussions, Samuel Thibault, 2020/01/08