Re: Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools.

[Ruben Safir]

On 1/29/20 1:54 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> The social contract you suggest has also been rejected, simply because
> we do not nor will we require members to accept such a document when
> they become GNU maintainers or volunteers.


This is going into a ban.  There is no other way around it.  These folk
now smell blood in the water and acting accordingly, and undermining the
main mission.  The focus now needs to be to find replacement maintainers
ASAP and removing privileges.

If you have a better solution to this, I am all ears.

The wiki is a straight power grab, and it is not the first time that
this group has tried to absconder with the GNU trademark.  The GUIX
maintainer did this just recently trying to rename his little project GNU.

Ruben

-- 
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com

DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com

Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013