[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [address@hidden: What's GNU -- and what's not]
From: |
Carlo Wood |
Subject: |
Re: [address@hidden: What's GNU -- and what's not] |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2020 22:56:00 +0100 |
This is try two... my previous mail did not come back,
so I looked at the archive of this mailing list and
also there it is missing. Then I compared the archive
with my the mails that I received on the mailinglist
(I never delete any mail) and it seems that archive
is selective in what it archives? Or am I wrong?
Anyway - here is what I replied before (this time leaving
out the quote):
==========begin of what is missing from archive===========
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Cc: gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [rms@gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:12:14 +0100
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:36:07 -0500
ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote:
> The GNU Project is sending this message to each GNU package
> maintainer.
>
> You may have recently received an email asking you to review a
> document titled "GNU Social Contract" and then to endorse it or reject
> it. It does not entirely accord with the GNU Project's views. It was
> created by some GNU participants who are trying to push changes
> on the GNU Project.
I stand by RMS for obvious reasons.
If he says this is a bad thing, then it is a bad thing.
Hence I reject it (actually, I just ignore it) and move
on to other things.
Have a good day,
Carlo Wood (author of countless GPL-ed things)
=====the rest of the quote is not repeated this time=====
Re: What's GNU -- and what's not, Ruben Safir, 2020/02/08
Re: What's GNU -- and what's not, Carlo Wood, 2020/02/08