[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation
|
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Moderation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:07:50 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 17:25:38 +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Indeed, given the toxicity on this list, I had presumed there was no
> moderation (any more). If it is that modereration is being applied, it is
> either sorely deficient, or an indication of the language that GNU permits
> (in spite of the 'kind communication' document). Which is a good
> demonstration of why people might not find it a welcoming organization.
It is worth reminding that readers of this list cannot see the number
and type of messages being rejected (and so cannot judge what moderation
is being done), and that this moderation is being done by volunteers on
their own time.
It is also worth reminding that it is not possible to make all parties
happy. Indeed, moderators get verbal lashings from all sides.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature