[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:08:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
Hello,
may I also kindly ask for Jean Louis to be put on moderation?
Actually, maybe Kaz Kylheku is right: I am sick... Sick of being gratuitously
insulted on this mailing list by people who happen to not share my opinion,
and sick of having to read follow-ups that basically imply that I deserve it
and should improve myself (supposedly, changing my opinions?) to avoid
further insults:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:36:36PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> You have published the Code of Conduct and non-authorized edict, and
> public shamings, etc. -- and then somebody is reacting and giving you
> the comment. The comment may not be kind as "you are sick" is not kind
> -- but if I would be in your shoes, I would look what am I really
> doing here -- I would ask myself, if that person is commenting, is
> there anything I should improve myself.
>
> Analyse who you are and what you are, people will not be calling you
> this way.
Andreas
PS: Whatever moderation decides, from here on I will not reply to messages
by Kaz Kylheku and Jean Louis, which I am likely to filter out. This
should not be interpreted as consent with their behaviour.
- Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alex Taylor, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
- Harrassment on this list, Andreas Enge, 2020/02/23
- Re: Harrassment on this list, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
- Re: Harrassment on this list, Andreas Enge, 2020/02/23