Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

gnu-misc-discuss

From:	Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Subject:	Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
Date:	Sat, 22 Feb 2020 19:32:52 +0100

Alex,

Alex Taylor 写道：

The Guile and Guix projects have both excluded and/or vilifiedpeople
who disagree with the people in power


This would trouble me deeply.  To whom did this happen, and why?

Kind regards,

T G-R

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
  - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/22
  - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <=
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Leo Famulari, 2020/02/24
  - Message not available
    - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Leo Famulari, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Daniel Pocock, 2020/02/27
  - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/27
    - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Daniel Pocock, 2020/02/28
    - Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/28