[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 03:19:05 +0100 |
Le dimanche 23 février 2020, 23:35:56 CET Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) a
écrit :
> On 2020-02-22 18:58, Amin Bandali wrote:
> > "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769@kylheku.com> writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> You are sick.
> >
> > I urge you to consider the GNU Kind Communications Guidelines [0] when
> > posting to GNU lists, as well as keeping this list's guidelines [1] in
> > mind when posting here.
>
> I sincerely believe that the code of conduct document published
> on the gnu.tools is the product of a sick mind.
>
> Make no mistake: this is not name-calling; I stand by it.
Jean-Louis made a really good answer to you I believe. A hinter of
social-minded anti-psychiatry couldn’t be more appropriate here.
“sick” looks like an objective statement, while it is the product of a
subjective judgement. You should make you more explicit rather than to
resort to simplistic metaphors, comparisons or links (to sickness) that
could be badly taken, or simply wrong.
Plus you know what? I think we’re all somewhat sick, to keep researching
freedom, in a inprisonned world ;)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/24
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Taylan Kammer, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/26
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Amin Bandali, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Alexandre François Garreau <=
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/22
- Re: lese majeste, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: lese majeste, orbulon, 2020/02/25