[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders
From: |
shulie |
Subject: |
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:30:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 |
On 3/24/21 10:13 PM, Akira Urushibata wrote:
> In response to the storm of criticism, the FSF Board has decided to
> vote to determine whether RMS should return to the board. I observe
> that both sides have initiated petition drives
The FSF just makes itself impotent and irrelevant like this. It needs
to take a stand on due process, tolerance and justice. The vote should
never have hapened and RMS should never had resigned. Let them open a
commitee to investigate charges, and hear witnesses through due fair
rules, not through petition wars and histerical crying. Until then, RMS
should remain in charge of the FSF. And honestly, when real due process
is applied, Richard will be COMPLETELY obsolved of any wrong doing. His
soul crime in he speaks up, defended his friends, and suffers some
emotional disabilities which these "people" exploit to drive him from
his lifes work.
- Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders, (continued)
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders, shulie, 2021/03/27
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders, shulie, 2021/03/27
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders, Jean Louis, 2021/03/25
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2021/03/25
Re: Truth matters when writing software and selecting leaders,
shulie <=